The Mad Schemes of Dr. Tectonic

*hops about*

YAY!

So, my mormon past has rubbed off on you via the internet, eh?

mwah hah hah!!! the plan has come to fruition!

From:

oh... and congratulations...

you guys...! *chucks lightly under chin*

From:

Same back atcha!

Your mormon past, my mormon past, 'sabu's mormon past...
How many mormon pasts have we got lying around here, anyway?

From:

that's three! :)

*hugs*

pssstt..... i even went on a mission!...

sshhhhh!!!!

From:

Ooo!

I was never very good at mormoning. I never even got a temple recommend! *gasp* Isn't it scandalous?!

I got fed up with the church's racism/sexism/homophobia/nonsense and starting being Mormon only on alternate Sundays... then alternate Thursdays... then alternate Thursdays in months without an 'R'... then alt-Thurs-mon-w/o-R when it was also a full moon... and then I just gave up on it altogether.

Now I'm a lapsed Episcopalian, which is a much more laid-back.

From:

oooo... ooooooo.... can i become a bible burning atheist?! PUH LEEEEEEEZE?! *wink*

From:

earthling177.livejournal.com

Cool, good luck!

From:

Thanks! =)

From:

This is probably not the right place for this, but ... too bad...

I've always had trouble with polyamorous, the adjective. Maybe I've absorbed too much conservatism from Gore Vidal, or whatever, but it seems like it's hard to call it an identity.

[That said, I also understand that other people take identities from different places than me; *shrug*. But polyamory to me just fits into that nice big barrel labelled "queer."]

From:

Oh, I hardly regard it as an identity -- just a descriptive adjective.
For identity, I generally stick with 'queer', too.
Though that's not as encompassing an identity as "geek"...

Actually, I mostly identify as "Beemer". =)

From:

I guess I'm just remembering a "more poly than thou" friend who visited us in Ithaca several years ago; I remember after she left thinking that it was starting to feel like veganism.

I still mostly identify as a combination of my faith, my occupation and my sexual orientation, even when some of these things have changed over the years. *shrug*

From:

Oh, bleah. How can you be poly and not get the "whatever works for you" deal?

From:

dpolicar

I'm suddenly reminded of

totient's mother, who famously remarked to his sister upon learning of his polyamory that she simply didn't approve of "polyamory." She added that "polyphilia" or "multiamory" would be fine, but this mixing of Greek and Latin roots just had to stop.

From:

Well, that's not hard, right? It's the usual convert rule. "This makes me happy, so you should want it, too. Don't you want it? Why don't you want it? If I tell you about how wonderful it is nonstop for the next hour, won't you want it?"

Feh.

From:

thatwesguy.livejournal.com

This is a timely concept for me; thanks. For what it's worth, I had been identifying as (militantly) polyamorous (or multiamorous or polyphilic, yes yes, Dave) for some months, having built up to it over years, and had finally started to get comfy with the notion, when I started dating someone for whom that really wasn't likely to fly. Except that this time, instead of being a real problem, it's turned out to be mostly a "problem on paper alone," since I don't find that I'm really interested in sharing romantic energy with anyone else. The big irony is that a strong contributing factor came from someone else I was dating in the beginning of this relationship, who pointed out that I don't really have the time or focus for multiple relationships in my life as it stands today.

My point is: when you least expect it, something good can smack you across the face. Congratulations, Beemer, on said smackage.

From:

That makes a lot of sense. [In particularly, the good smacking you across the face when you least expect you; I'd probably put it as "God moves in mysterious ways..."]

I can certainly accept that someone might use the phrase "I am poly" to mean "I generally don't have monogamous relationships," or even "I never have monogamous relationships." But the latter of these seems somehow hard for me to believe in. Again, though, *shrug*. Probably some people think of their attraction to redheads as an identity. Feh.

From:

baronet.livejournal.com

Certainly Poly is a label, and therefore you shouldn't make too many assumptions without more details.

While poly is a looser label than some, all labels have some squish in them, as demonstrated by the number of lesbians I know who met the guy that was the exception for them. Amy, for instance is a confirmed lesbian and tomist: she is attracted to girls and Tom. Should she describe herself as bisexual? Lesbian is 99% accurate, and she's happier if guys she meets treat her as a lesbian rather than bi, even if she's very happy with Tom.

To pick an example of poly as an identify as opposed to a descriptor of a current state: A friend of mine would feel uncomfortable promising monogamy even if he isn't currently involved with anyone else, or even looking. To do so would be a misrepresentation of himself. Kind of like someone can be gay even when they are not currently involved with anyone.

Poly as a label is useful, even if it is a subset of some other label, like non-vanilla, or a superset of another label, like "In a triad". It is good to exchange coming out stories, hear about the rules and experiences of others. It is good to hear about the legal side of poly with wills and kids and stuff. How and when do you say "wow, you're awesome, you should meet my wife"?

Oh, and BTW CONGRATULATIONS to Beemer & co.

From:

Thanks--that's a useful perspective.

[I've always tried to be supportive of other people's identities, even where I have a hard time understanding them. Maybe from the outside looking in, it feels like this is a pot of things that don't have coherence, where from the inside it might not. I'll have to think more...]

From:

Thanks, and the same back at you! It's pretty good smackage.

From:

detailbear.livejournal.com

Congratulations to the three of you. May you all be as happy as clams for many years to come.

HUGS.

From:

Thank you!

From:

thetarnishedowl.livejournal.com

Well, they do say that three is the new two.

From:

Does that mean pi is the new e? ;-)

From:

thatwesguy.livejournal.com

Well, congratulations, Beemer! I'm delighted for you all!!

From:

madbodger.livejournal.com

w00t! Nah, I don't wanna fight you. Or the kung fu one (especially since he stopped smoking).

From:

Well, that's good. We'd have to fly a long way to do the fighting, and it'd just be inconvenient.
Thanks!

From:

tdjohnsn.livejournal.com

Congratulations!

From:

Thanks much!

From:

ng-nighthawk.livejournal.com

Three in the house is working for us, so good luck to you all. I hope to get to know Greg better in the future.

Woo-hoo!

From:

Thanks, Neal!

From:

psyclonic.livejournal.com

See, I had this dream in the past couple years... now I gotta toss that interpretation out... for a good reason, tho.

Your (collective) happiness is mine and others' happiness.

Cheers!

From: