dr_tectonic: (Default)
[personal profile] dr_tectonic
The problem with starting a good book at lunch is that then you have to stop reading it when lunch is over.

Date: 2005-08-17 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-tectonic.livejournal.com
To clarify: if OTL is true, it implies that there is for everyone a One who is the perfect match and can fulfill all of their partner's needs and desires completely. The existence of people who desire more than one gender is therefore argument against OTL.

Naturally, that doesn't mean that you can't be fulfilled with a single person no matter what your desires are -- just that it's silly to think there's some individual that's going to meet ALL needs and desires...

So yeah, we're in agreement.

Hey, and thanks for the strikeout! =)

Date: 2005-08-17 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ng-nighthawk.livejournal.com
Ah, see, I forgot that the OTL implies one person fulfills all needs. Bah, we've spent too much energy on this concept merely by disputing it. I dismiss it entirely to the Realm of Bad Myths.

"One True Love," please take your place between Hard "Work Will Make You Succeed/Failures Have Not Worked Hard Enough" and "Blink Tags Make Web Sites Cool."

Date: 2005-08-17 08:11 pm (UTC)
navrins: (Default)
From: [personal profile] navrins
I like blondes and brunettes. So I can't have One True Love, because nobody can be both.

(And if you throw "hair dye" at me, I'll throw "sex-change surgery" at you, so don't go there.)

Date: 2005-08-17 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-tectonic.livejournal.com
Yes, exactly! That's what I was trying to say.